| |
VISITORS
AT THE BRINK
|
|
By
Jim Burns
|
|
Particularly
because our MAS chapter has such a long-standing and outstanding
reputation for environmental activism, it is easy for us to become
fixated on the negatives in the uphill battle to save the planet
from ourselves.
We are Sisyphus.
The rock is daunting.
The
lady on our cover was just one of the hordes of visitors at the
South Rim of the Grand Canyon over the 4th of July
holiday. As we
maneuvered the parking lots on our first day, looking for condors or
condor jams, we played the license plate game, missing only DE, HI
and ND from the fifty states. We
missed the condors too, but at sundown I caught a rumor from a West
Rim shuttle driver. All
the Peregrine Fund trucks were out at The Abyss, the first overlook
west of Mohave Point.
The
Grand Canyon shuttles run early this time of year to accommodate
hikers hoping to beat the summer heat.
The next morning I was on the West Rim shuttle at 5:00 a.m. Just myself, my tripod and lens, and three backpackers headed
for Hermit's Rest trailhead. At
5:15 the sun climbed over the horizon and flooded the awestriking
vertical wall of The Abyss with golden light.
There was not another human being within five miles.
A quarter mile west and a quarter mile straight down along
the ledges of the Toroweap, eleven California Condors were on that
wall, waking, wingstretching, preening, looking from that distance
like Turkey Vultures except for the large, easily readable wing and
tail tags securing their radio transmitters.
I
hurried along the rim trail seeking a vantage point close enough to
the roost for decent camera looks, but by the time I had walked a
mile without another sighting I realized the dropoff was too sheer
to allow observation of the ledges from directly above.
I had walked |
right over
the condors. I
finally lip reached a point where I could look back to the area I had
first seen them. They
were gone! Twenty-five
pound birds with ten foot wingspans do not f away like the
warblers and titmice foraging along the trail.
I turned back, crossed the top of a promontory, crested a
small rise where the path again brought me within yards of the edge,
and was brought to an incredulous halt in mid-stride.
Condors
were boiling up out of the canyon all around me! It was 7:15. As
the rock began reflecting the sun's heat, they had caught the early
thermals, launching upon their daily activities of searching for
food and assuaging their innate curiosity about the tiny upright
creatures milling about the rim.
Some were still below me, circling up the wall.
Some were already above me, soaring out of sight around the
promontory. Two were
drifting right toward me, rim level, too close to focus binoculars
or lens. I dropped to
my knees, heard them pass
within yards, spoke aloud to them, sat for moments unmoving, out of
body, out of time, some lone pilgrim to some premodern planet.
The
lady on our cover was hatched in the LA zoo in May, 1996.
Her father, Mandan, was the second condor ever hatched from
captive bred parents, spring of 1989.
Her mother, Tama, was captured as an adult in 1985, one of
the last nine condors left in the wild.
At sundown on our second day she was atop the Orphan Mine
tower, between the Powell Memorial and Maricopa Point, with eleven
of her kind, half of the wild condors gracing the wilderness of rock
and canyon that is northern Coconino County.
There are now 160 California Condors in the world, the
twenty-four in Arizona two more than
(continued
on page 14) |
|
• •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • |
| |
PUBLIC
LANDS GRAZING RESOLUTION
(continued
from page 6)
|
|
2.
Inappropriate
livestock grazing can be a damaging commercial extractive use of
public lands. As such,
grazing may not be an appropriate use for all areas defined by many
land management agencies as "suitable."
Livestock grazing must be re-evaluated by the public land
management agency at the strategic planning level, and defined
according to what is both suitable and appropriate.
3.
Public lands livestock grazing should be permitted at
stocking rates, which are balanced with vegetation production,
rangeland restoration, watershed and soils protection, wild ungulate
forage needs, and other wildlife habitat values, including those
where birds nest. Capacity
determinations should include domestic and wild ungulates in a
distribution scheme that accounts for populations of wild ungulates
and their associated forage needs.
Forage utilization standards that reflect this balance should
be monitored regularly, including annual mid-point and end-of-season
monitoring and trend monitoring over the life of an allotment
management plan. Term
grazing permits should be modified immediately upon the
determination, through aggressive monitoring, that permitted numbers
exceed capacity and utilization standards.
4.
Economic
subsidies to the livestock industry should be reformed to eliminate
inappropriate use of public lands and resources
.5.
Livestock
grazing fees on public lands should be determined by market
mechanisms and should cover the cost of |
administering
and monitoring the livestock grazing program, taking into
consideration the protection, management and restoration of the
lands previously used by livestock.
6.
Public
land agencies must actively seek the widest possible citizen
participation in all decisions regarding livestock grazing on public
lands. To that end management agencies must make monitoring,
analysis, planning and decision documents, including drafts, freely
available by Internet access to the maximum extent feasible.
7.
Livestock
grazing on public lands must be administered under comprehensive
plans that are designed at the ecosystem scale with primary
consideration given to ecosystem integrity.
8.
The
National Wildlife Refuge System, the National Park System and
certain National Monuments are not multiple use lands, but were
established to protect specific historic and natural resources and
values. Livestock
grazing should be prohibited on such public lands unless there is
solid scientific documentation that livestock grazing is beneficial
or at least not detrimental to the legislated purpose of the Refuge,
Park or Monument.
9.
Predator
control on public lands that attempts to reduce livestock
depredation should utilize scientific based techniques and livestock
management methods that reduce livestock vulnerability to predation.
Predator control on public lands must integrate long-term predator
population viability and management goals. |
| 13 |
|
|
BIG
SIT! 2000 WRAP UP REPORT FINALLY ARRIVES |
|
|
By
Herb Fibel
|
For
the second consecutive year Arizona had two Big Sit! circles-The
Maricopa Audubon "Asterisks" at the Granite Reef
Recreation Area, and Matt Brown's "Squatters" at Sonoita
Creek, near Patagonia, in southern Arizona.
The two teams recorded a total of 84 species, down from
1999's total of 97.
Nevertheless, we ranked 5th
in the continental U.S. for total number of species seen after
California, which had 6 circles and 172 species, Connecticut, which
had 14 circles and 139 species, Michigan, which had 4 circles and
105 species, and Texas, which had 3 circles and 91 species. The
annual October event is now international in scope (pardon the
expression) with circles in England and in The Netherlands.
The circle with the highest count for the second straight
year was Jim Royer's Elfin Forest Circle in Los Osos, San Luis
Obispo County, California with 122 species. (I'm going to try to
obtain specific directions to this location, because anyplace where
that many species can be seen while sitting in one place must be a
really hot birding spot.) There
were 66 circles altogether, and some 266 individual sitters.
Twenty-two new species were added to the
|
cumulative count
total in
the U.S., in this the Big Sit!'s 8th year, four of which
came exclusively from Arizona-Pyrrhuloxia, Canyon towhee, Brewer's
sparrow, and Bronzed cowbird-the latter three contributed by the
Asterisks.
Maricopa
Audubon members will be participating in our 6th annual Big Sit! at
our Granite Reef Recreation Area site this coming October 14th,
and again we'll be raising money for Maricopa Audubon.
We're sorry, but the six regulars who person the Circle
pretty well fill up the allocated space, what with our picnic table,
barbecue grill, lounge chairs, traditional baclava and champagne
coolers, but we welcome your visit and encouragement.
We ordinarily record between 45 and 50 species.
If you would like to make a per species seen pledge this
year, call Herb Fibel at (480) 966-5246.
Contributors (we'll bill you after the event) of $ 1.00 or
more per species, will have their name or their business name,
whichever they prefer, listed in an upcoming issue of the Wren-dition.
If you would like to establish a Big Sit!
Circle of your own, please let me know and I'll tell you how
you can get started.
The underlying purpose is to enjoy looking at birds while
relaxing with friends.
It's really a lot of fun.
|
|
• •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • |
|
VISITORS
AT THE BRINK
(continued
from page 13)
|
|
| the
1982 world total of twenty-two.
Releases at the Vermilion Cliff site in northern Arizona
began in 1996. This
March an egg was found in a Grand Canyon cave, the first egg laid in
the wild since 1986.
If
you consider yourself an environmentalist and you've grown weary
pushing the rock, if you're tired of cows grazing your national
forests, if you can't relate to blind salamanders or tiny
flycatchers, go to the Canyon.
Condors, even with their reputation as nature's undertakers
and some less than endearing traits such as urohidrosis (you don't
even want to know), are a part of the "charismatic megafauna"--wolves,
bears, whales--animals at the top of the food chain whose size and
personality allow us to identify with them and truly understand that
a world without them would be a lesser place.
In
the autumn of 1979, already well into the autumn of their existence,
I went on a MAS field trip to Mt Pinos in southern California to see
the condors. We saw a
huge bird soaring the mountaintops many miles away.
It might have been a condor.
It might have been a Golden Eagle.
It might have been a mirage of wishful thinking.
Bob Bradley hiked for an hour in the direction it had flown,
but returned with no news. I
knew at that moment I would probably never see a California Condor
in the wild.
Shortly
after sundown, the lady on our cover flew from the mine tower down
toward Maricopa Point.
After my morning experience I had decided to concentrate on
flight shots, left behind my heavy fixed
|
telephoto lens and tripod, and grabbed a smaller, lighter zoom.
Running the quarter mile to Maricopa Point in the waning
light, I realized I had not taken a photograph of a perched bird
without a tripod for eight years.
In my hand was Canon's new 100-400 image stabilized zoom.
I ran out to the point and looked back.
She was fifty yards behind me on a ledge just below the rim,
screened by vegetation.
I
set down my pack, circled back, walked toward the edge.
At five steps from eternity my knees started to go.
I stopped, got down on my belly, and scrunched forward,
pushing Canon's new technology in front of me.
She was there, totally in shadow twenty yards away, didn't
see me or didn't care.
I was one foot from the brink.
One foot from her world.
Without her wings.
My light meter told me I would have to hold this shot for
1/30th of a second.
I knew I had never before gotten a sharp photo hand held at
that speed at that magnification.
I also knew I would probably never again be this close to a
California Condor in the wild.
As
you can see, Canon's new technology is wonderful.
So are the technical advances which have allowed us this
occasional environmental success story.
Those same advances which have fueled the growth which has
made those successes a necessity.
The ironies and analogies are fascinating if not terrifying.
Proponents of biological diversity plead for saving the DNA
that could save our lives.
I have seen the lady on the cover in her world.
It has renewed my soul.
|
| 14 |
|