| The
internet discussion on thrasher distribution which ensued last
March when Stuart Healy and I questioned John Prather's
sighting of multiple Curve-billeds at the Salome Highway site
reiterated two key tenets of bird identification-just because
you see a bird doesn't mean you will be able to or have to put
a label on it, and just because locals have not recorded a
species in an area doesn't mean it may not be seen
there. As Stuart so perceptively pointed out, habitats
and the bird populations they car can and do change over time.
Fall is when migrant thrashers
pass through central Arizona and migrant birders begin to
visit the Salome Highway site. Scritching around in the
shadows under a bush or scampering away through the desert
scrub are typical thrasher sighting scenarios. Thus,
thrashers in black and white is a good exercise because it
takes us beyond our reliance on color to considerations of
shape and structure, which may be all you get if your thrasher
isn't teed up and singing in full sunlight as it might be
during a late winter/early spring breeding season.
Our eight thrasher species
are notoriously difficult because several of them share
habitat, plumage characteristics, and structural
features. Any thrasher observation should begin with tow
precautions. Be meticulous in your evaluation of field
marks, and resist the temptation to base identification on
preconceived notions and expectations.
A)
Good Photo, Easy Bird
Here we see a robust thrasher
with a very thick bill, both mandibles decurved, and a peaked
crown. We see a light iris and relatively dark plumage,
uniform except for the lighter throat and the indistinct,
perhaps circular spotting in the breast and belly.
Let's eliminate Brown and
Long-billed because their streaking is much more distinct and
neat. In fact, let's eliminate these two species from
the entire quiz for that reason, but before you leave for
south Texas this winter, let me show you my Long-billed slides
which I incorrectly labeled "Brown." Thrashers
are NEVER as easy as they seem in the guide books!.
Nets, let's eliminate
thrashers with unmarked underparts, and let's eliminate Sage
Thrasher because of that big, honking bill. Now, tell me
if this is a Bendire's or a Curve-billed. Some field
guides say Bendire's lower mandibles is straight. Sibley
says only that it is "straighter." Sibley also
says Bendire's has a peaked crown. Most field guides
characterize Bendire's spots as arrowhead or triangular, but
not all remind you that these spots fade out and become less
distinct with wear. Most will tell you Bendire's
is shaped like Sage, whereas Curve-billed has a Crissal jizz,
but when you're this close anything is going to look big and
chesty. And don't forget that juvenile Curved-billeds
have shorter bills and lighter irises than adults? So,
tell me if this is a Bendire's or a Curve-billed.
Here's the heart of the
thrasher matter. This is the best Curve-billed (I
observed it both calling and singing) photograph I've ever
taken, perhaps the best I've ever seen, and I don't believe
you can conclusively determine from this photograph whether
this bird is a Bendire's or a Curve-billed. And color
wouldn't have helped us a bit! Are you beginning to get
the thrasher picture now? This Curve-billed Thrasher was
photographed March 1999 in....
B)
Good Photo, Difficult Bird
Well,
only three of our eight thrashers have unmarked underparts.
But, those three share a similar shape, a light throat with strong,
dark moustachial markings, a tail longer than Curve-billed, and a
bill that is longer and thinner and thus more obviously downcurved
than Curve-billed, and a bill that is longer and thinner and thus
more obviously downcurved than Curve-billed. Sure, you won't
see a California Thrasher in Arizona, but Crissal and Le Conte's
have been seen at the Salome Highway site in the same bush, and both
occur in the California deserts not far from proper California
Thrasher habitat.
|
If
you think this can't be a Le Conte's because it's too dark overall,
let me remind you this bird is not frontlit like our first and third
birds, but sidelit, flanks and topside shadowed by the front half of
its body, An it has a dark eye.
If
you think this can't be a Crissal because of that dark eye, let me
show you some of my color slides of Crissals wherein the iris
appears dark because of the angle of light, and let me give you a
quaote from a field guide published in 1985 which says "The
Crissal is virtually identical to the California Thrasher."
If
you think this can't be a California because the face isn't strongly
enough patterned or contrasty enough with the throat, notice that
the bird is singing and the wind is blowing big time. The
throat feathers are distended and all of the bird's plumage is in
disarray. Just two more monkey wrenches in your best case
field observation scenario.
Here
again is the hear of the thrasher matter. this is a good,
close-up shot, but if you don't know where this photograph was
taken, the identification of this bird is very problematical, and
these same problems can and will occur in the field. In this
case color would have been somewhat helpful. In sunlight, even
at this angle, I can't imagine the beady black patent leather eye of
Le Conte's not standing our more obviously from the pale, plain
face. So tell me if this is a California or a Crissal. I
don't think you can conclusively decide form this photo.
This
California Thrasher was photographed Easter Day 2001 at Lake Hodges
north of San Diego. Oh, and that curve-billed in our first
photo was taken at Papago Park near the zoo in Phoenix.
C)
Bad Photo, Easy Bird
Usually the
solution to our final quiz is easier and more to the point by virtue
of our considerations of the first tow birds. Thus, we know
this thrasher is one of three: Curve-billed, Bendire's, or
Sage. Compared to our Curve-billed, this bird appears somewhat
smaller, somewhat shorter billed, and the lower mandible, if not
straight, does at least appear straighter. We see rounded
crown, a light iris and the same indistinct, perhaps circular
spotting on the breast and belly.
It wouldn't be
hard in field to glance at this bird and think Sage Thrasher.
There seems to be a hint of a wingbar, but it could be the play of
light. The spotting seems more distinct than we're used to
seeing on a Curve-billed or a Bendire's, and remember that the
crisp, contrasty spotting on Sage fades out by late summer.
But you just can't get past that long, curved bill-too long and
curved for any Sage Thrasher
Let's eliminate
Sage and go back to the quiz clue. We've had an Arizona
thrasher and a California thrasher. Bendire's breed in Utah
and New Mexico and can even be found in Nevada and Colorado.
Sure, and your preconceived notions and expectations follow you
around to every state in the union. This bird is not a
Bendire's. This is Toxostoma Curvirostre oberholseri,
the Texas race of Curve-billed, photographed near Raymondville,
Texas, February 2002.
Compared to our
central Arizona Curve-billed T.c. paleri, T.c. oberholseri, is
smaller, somwhat shorter billed, shows wingbars like a Sage and
tailspots like a Bendire's, and has a lighter ventral back-ground
color which makes its spot appear more distinct. To my tin ear
the songs sound very similar, but it's a good bet if you netted a
Texas Curve-billed and released it in Phoenix it would die without
progeny.
These two races of
Curve-billed may well be split in the future after further DNA
studies.
I'm not sure what
Stuart learned from his initial inquiry regarding thrashers at the
Salome Highway site, but learned never to question another birder's
identification (at least not publicly). That's probably a good
lesson for all of us, and here's another one Question carefully
every thrasher identification your ever make.
|