CONTENTS:  

Events & Programs • From the Editor • Notes & Announcements •  Conservation - Fighting Forest Fires  • Photo Quiz • Book Review - Sparrow of the United States & Canada, The Photographic Guide • FYI -West Nile Virus: It's Headed Our Way   • Carefree Christmas Bird Count Summary, December 28, 2001 • In Memoriam - Lillian Diven 1920-2002 •  Field Trips  •  Photo Quiz Answers • AZ Special Species - Broad-Dilled Hummingbird  • Sightings •  FYI-Earth Justice: Because the Earth Needs a Good Lawyer  


Yellow-billed Loon photographed by Jim Burns at Lake Havasu on the Colorado River 3/02 with Canon 400 mm f/2.3 lens and Fujichrome Velvia film.

 

FIGHTING FOREST FIRES

By Charles Babbitt

Perhaps no single factor has had a more adverse impact on forest health than fire suppression. For eighty years we have disrupted the natural fire cycle by aggressively fighting virtually all fires, big and small. As a result, parts of our forests are overstocked with young trees and burdened with excess fuel.

This year’s exceptionally dry winter could set the stage for another active fire season in Arizona forests this summer. Two years ago over 6.5 million acres burned in the West including 85,000 acres in Arizona. The controversy created by those fires highlights the need to re-examine our current approach to fighting forest fires.

Arizona’s Ponderosa pine and higher elevation conifer forests have always had naturally occurring fires.  Fires in the Ponderosa pine forest were fairly frequent and of low intensity while less frequent fires in the conifer forests often consumed entire stands of trees. Fires thinned the forest and removed excess fuel. They also created openings for pioneer species like aspen and helped control disease and insects.

In spite of increased controlled burning and policy changes that allow some natural burns  in wilderness areas, firefighters continue to jump on most wildland fires. Fires are still viewed by much of the public and media as catastrophes rather than naturally occurring necessary events. Last summer’s Leroux fire and the previous summer’s Pumpkin fire near Flagstaff are examples.

If we continue to suppress fires we can expect even bigger fires in the future as fuel continues to accumulate.  We cannot mechanically thin forests and remove fuel over the entire western landscape even if it were biologically desirable which it is not.  There is simply not enough money in the federal budget.  Instead, we need to stand back and let our forests burn.

Prescribed burns are fine but we must also accept the fact that we are going to have big uncontrolled fires. Big fires, though less frequent, are as much a part of our environment as hurricanes. They are usually a result of a combination of environmental factors that include a long period of severe drought, high winds, low humidity, and fire favoring topography. It is these fires that have the vigor to significantly alter and regenerate our forests. Fires do not destroy forests, they change them. That is one of the lessons of the Yellowstone fires of 1988.

Yellowstone and other big fires also teach us about the myth of fire suppression. Efforts to control and extinguish big fires are, by and large, futile. The Forest Service and other land management agencies falsely take credit for putting out big fires when in reality they only go out when there is change in the environmental conditions that caused them in the first place. It is not armies of fire fighters and slurry dropping planes that put out most big fires, but changes in wind, humidity, fuel and topography. That was the case with many of Arizona’s big fires including the Dude Fire (1990), the Lone Fire (1996) and the Coon Creek Fire (2000). The question is why do we waste millions of taxpayer dollars and risk the lives of fire fighters trying to put them out.

Last year congress appropriated 1.6 billion dollars under the National Fire Plan to improve our firefighting efforts. Spending fire prevention money to protect communities at the urban-wildland interface is money well spent but it should not be spent on so called forest restoration or other logging -in-disguise projects away from communities in an attempt to fireproof our forests.

Instead of looking for excuses to put out fires, we need to look for reasons to let them burn. Deciding when and where to fight fires is complex, but we must do a better job picking our fights with nature.

Last summer many people were concerned that the Leroux Fire near Flagstaff might mar the scenic beauty of the San Francisco Peaks. We must remember, however, that it is not nature’s job to provide us scenic views.  On the other hand, go up to Escudilla mountain near Alpine next fall and marvel at the large stands of golden aspen on the high slopes and remember that it was a big forest fire in 1951 that made it all possible.

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 

3   

SPRING - 2002 PHOTO QUIZ

 

By Jim Burns

 


A) Good Photo, Easy Bird

 

 

This Issue's Clue:

All three of these species can be found right here in Maricopa County.  Of coarse not everyone may want to see all of them in Maricopa County.

 

 

 

 


B) Good Photo, Difficult Bird

 

 

 


C) Bad Photo, Easy Bird

 

4

Page:                2          3                   5          6          7          8          9          10          11           12          13          14 

MAS Home Page • Join MAS • Chapter Info • Meetings • Activist Info • Other Sites • Newsletter • Field Trips • Calendar • AZ Birding • Christmas Count

Last updated: May 15, 2002
©2002, Maricopa Audubon Society. All rights reserved.
Mail comments to: webmaster@maricopaaudubon.org